PV Anti-Soiling Dashboard

Tabuk / NEOM Region Study

Solar panels in Tabuk desert

Final Year Project — Fahad Bin Sultan University

Smart Anti-Soiling Strategies for PV Systems

Optimizing cleaning schedules and evaluating anti-soiling coatings for photovoltaic modules in the Tabuk/NEOM desert environment.

Jouri Alboqami & Ghadeer Ahmed
Supervised by Dr. Yasser Ahmed

Dust Sensitivity Reduction

44%

Cleaning Frequency Reduction

41%

Energy Yield Increase

2.1%

Total Cost Reduction

2.5%

Dust Accumulation Over Time

Comparison of dust buildup on uncoated vs. ASC-coated PV modules over 90 days

024681012141618202224262830323436384042444648505254565860626466687072747678808284868890Day00.751.52.253Dust (g/m²)
  • Uncoated
  • ASC-Coated
Uncoated: 0.15 g/m²/day — threshold at ~20 days
ASC-Coated: 0.079 g/m²/day — threshold at ~38 days

Power Loss vs. Dust Density

Loss of power (%) as a function of dust accumulation density (g/m²)

012345678910Dust Density (g/m²)06121824Power Loss (%)
  • Uncoated
  • ASC-Coated

Key Finding: At 10 g/m² dust density, uncoated panels lose 22.1% power while ASC-coated panels lose only 11.3% — a 50% reduction in dust sensitivity thanks to the anti-soiling coating.

Daily Energy Production

Simulated daily energy output (Wh) for a 10 Wp module over 90 days

24681012141618202224262830323436384042444648505254565860626466687072747678808284868890Day9098106120Energy (Wh)
  • Uncoated
  • ASC-Coated

Comprehensive Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of uncoated vs. ASC-coated PV module performance

ParameterUncoatedASC-CoatedImprovement
Attenuation Coefficient0.025 m²/g0.012 m²/g52% reduction
Dust Accumulation Rate0.15 g/m²/day0.079 g/m²/day47% reduction
Cleaning Threshold Time20 days38 days90% longer
Cleaning Events (90 days)15 events8 events47% fewer
Avg. Power Loss3.3%1.65%50% reduction
90-Day Energy Yield4.15 kWh4.25 kWh+2.4%
Optimal Cost ($/10Wp)$1.42$1.382.8% savings